|
Rep.
Richardson's April 6, 2007 Update
Gay Rights, Civil Rights & Citizen Rights
The subject of granting "Civil Rights" protection to individuals who are part of Oregon’s gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) population is on a fast-track to becoming Oregon law. I believe expanding civil rights to include such behavior-based activities is not in the best interest of Oregon or its citizens. Here is why. Senate Bill 2 has already passed the Senate and will have public hearings in the House on Monday, April 9, 2007. Notwithstanding the magnitude and consequences of this bill on Oregon churches, schools, closely-held businesses and the rights of individual citizens who hold strong religious beliefs about morality, the Chair of the House Elections, Ethics and Rules Committee, Representative Diane Rosenbaum, has just scheduled a Work Session to pass S.B. 2 out of her Committee on the following morning, Tuesday, April 10th. If this occurs the bill could be up for a full House vote on Thursday, April 12, 2007. Essentially, S.B. 2 is a Civil Rights bill that elevates “Sexual Orientation” to the same protected civil rights status as race and religion. The bill defines “Sexual Orientation” as follows:
“Sexual orientation” means an individual’s actual or perceived heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality or gender identity, regardless of whether the individual’s gender identity, appearance, expression or behavior differs from that traditionally associated with the individual’s sex at birth. (Senate Bill 2, Section 1, para. 6)
One problem with elevating sexual orientation, “perceived” homosexuality, appearance, expression and behavior to a protected, civil rights status is the uncertainty of enforcement. Current protected classes of civil rights are based on who people are, not what they do.Martin Luther King Jr.'s niece, Alveta Scott King, expressed the difference when she said, "While I have met many former homosexuals, I have yet to meet a former black." On the other side of the issue, former lesbian, Yvette Schneider, asked the thought provoking question when responding to the issue of special rights based on sexual orientation, "Why should I receive less protection now that I am no longer a lesbian?" The GLBT activists and their sympathizers repeatedly exclaim their GLBT proclivities are inherent and genetic. I am not one who accepts theory as fact, merely because allegations are made passionately and frequently. My research for dispositive, peer-reviewed evidence of a “homosexual gene” has been without success. (For those who care to read a summary of the research, click here.) I have no doubt GLBT tendencies are real and powerful, but tendencies are one thing and behavior is another. If S.B. 2 becomes law—and the Senate and House leaders believe it will—there will be consequences to the many Oregonians whose religious and moral beliefs strongly oppose the GLBT lifestyle. For instance,
S.B. 2 will grant state sanctioned and enforced civil rights protections for a person's appearance and behavior. Please understand, I am against constitutionally protected discrimination and I believe individuals should have the right to live their own lives with a minimum of interference. I am also committed to defending our inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I am willing to tolerate another person's sexual preferences, but I am unwilling to use the force of governmental power to elevate that person's sexual preferences, appearance and behavior above the religious, commercial, educational, residential and personal freedoms of the majority of Oregonians. Sincerely,
Representative Bruce Hanna (R-Roseburg) currently is serving as Deputy House Republican Leader. Born and raised in Douglas County, he graduated from South Umpqua High School, where he served as Student Body President. After graduating he began a job at Coca-Cola Bottling Company in Roseburg and enrolled at Umpqua Community College. After college, Hanna was accepted to the Dairy Queen International Franchise training program. After two years of sales, growth, profit and the outlook for more to come, Bruce was part of the 1983 Management Candidate Program for Coca-Cola. He accepted an offer from Coca-Cola Bottling of Roseburg where he returned as their Sales Manager. Over a six year period, Bruce negotiated for and purchased three additional bottling companies to merge into Siskiyou Beverages, Inc. The company grew in size and value and was sold in 1990. That year Bruce and his wife, Teresa, were married. Together, they began to raise Bruce's two sons and, in 1994, their daughter was born. Bruce and Teresa purchased the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Roseburg and its sister company Automatic Vending Service. Today, Bruce and Teresa are the sole owners of Automatic Vending Service and majority stockholders in Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Roseburg where Bruce is the President and CEO with executive management duties. Hanna completed his Bachelors of Science degree from Northwest Christian College in 1996. He is Past President of the Oregon Soft Drink Association, a member and Past President of the Roseburg Executive Association and the Roseburg Area Chamber of Commerce. |
Capitol Calendar
On the Road| Missed a Newsletter? Download past newsletters at http://www.dennisrichardson.org/news.htm |
Capitol Office
900 Court Street NE, H-392
Salem, OR 97301
Tel: (503) 986-1404
Fax: (503) 986-1590
E-Mail: rep.dennisrichardson@state.or.us
Please tell a friend about House District 4 Legislative Update.
To subscribe to our Legislative Updates by email click here
To unsubscribe, click here.