|
Rep. Richardson's
Legislative Update
March 4, 2005 Bi-Partisan Politics In Salem?Yes. It is true. For the first time in recent years, the bicameral, bipartisan system is actually working; the concepts of confrontation, negotiation, and compromise actually occurred.From previous newsletters you know this legislative session’s approach to budgeting is vastly different from past ones. Until now Current Service Level (CSL) budgeting was the process. CSL budgeting is where the legislature starts with the last budget amount, and then considers and hears the many pleas for additional money, and then makes a list of all the expenditures, before going to see what revenue is available. This process has been compared to going grocery shopping; walking the aisles and filling the shopping cart with all the items you “really need”, then going to the check-out stand before considering how much money you have to pay for everything. Since the stock market bubble burst, CSL budgeting has resulted in extensive additional debt and two failed attempts to raise Oregon taxes. But this session is different. At the beginning of this session the Governor and leaders of both the Senate and the House each promised to turn away from CSL budgeting, and live within our means. To accomplish this change, each proposed using Performance-Based Budgeting.
Performance-Based Budgeting requires:
Everything was going fine until the Senate Democrats started hedging on the idea of waiting to discuss (or publicize) spending amounts until after the priorities had been set and the revenue pie determined. The House leaders reminded the Senate leaders that the agreed-to plan was to finish prioritizing and determine the amount of revenue available before publicly discussing how much should be spent to fund various programs. Last Friday the State Economist announced the “March Forecast” of projected revenues for the next biennium, and a growing economy resulted in a $202 million increased forecast. The Senate Dems could not resist politicizing a good forecast, and announced their plan to fund K-12 education at $5.4 billion—an amount that obviously was $200 million higher than the revised forecast. When this Senate pronouncement was made, it not only was viewed by the House as a breach of the agreement to stay with the Performance-Based Budgeting plan, but, since the Senate and House co-chairs had been unable to agree on the size of the revenue pie, it looked like the Senate “D’s” were starting the old grocery shopping spree. The feeling among House Republicans was, “There they go again.” The House “R’s” were not interested in playing that game again. House Republican leaders, after obtaining unanimous approval from House Republican members, responded by canceling all further Joint Senate/House Ways and Means Subcommittee meetings chaired by the House, and began making plans to break up the joint process and proceed with the Performance-Based Budgeting program alone. With weaker or more dogmatic leaders, the break-up would have been final, conversation would have terminated between the Senate and the House, and the legislative session would have been both contentious and protracted. Fortunately, Oregon’s Senate and House leaders continued discussing the impasse. Negotiations ensued. Both legislative houses determined it would be best if the Ways and Means process continued with the joint committees following the Performance Based Budgeting plan. So the major hang-up was whether or not there could be Senate/House agreement on the size of the revenue pie. Offers were made; counter-offers followed. Finally, late yesterday afternoon, a final agreement was reached that set the limit for Oregon’s 2005-07 biennial General Funds budget at $12.393 billion. This amount was more than the House Republicans wanted to spend, and less than the Senate Democrats wanted to accept. The House Republicans were willing to accept a 2005-07 biennial budget of $12.393 only after they determined it could be financed with current revenues-- i.e. without raising taxes or increasing state debt. And, for the sake of keeping the legislative process on track, it was a reasonable compromise. In the past, such agreements have been oral, and subsequently broken due to misunderstanding, misinterpretation or mischievousness. This time the agreement is clear, concise and signed in ink. The Memorandum of Agreement says the following: “The 2005-07 Budget will be neither more nor less than $12,393 billion.” It also says the co-chairs of Ways and Means will present their budget “By April 4, 2005.” There was to be no relationship between the two provisions. (Click here to see the Memorandum of Agreement.) If either the Senate or House leadership believe the agreement allows for wiggle room that would permit passing a final 2005-07 biennial budget higher than $12.393 billion, that perception should be made known immediately. I have sent a letter to both the Senate and House leadership to ensure a common understanding exists that the $12.393 billion amount is the “final” 2005-07 general funds budget amount. If either side has a different understanding it should be immediately made known to the other, so there will be no misunderstanding about this issue later this session. Reining In Child Case-Worker Renegades—
During my time focusing on the Department of Human Services, I have met many ethical, intelligent and concerned public servants. I am certain the vast majority of DHS workers across Oregon are fine human beings. Unfortunately, a few unethical, heavy-handed, self-serving child welfare workers use their positions of power to the detriment of parents and children whom they have promised to serve. Multiple continuing complaints from Curry, Josephine, Jackson and Klamath counties to name a few, cannot be ignored. Complaints of caseworkers leading parents to believe the agency is working toward family reunification while in reality working toward termination of parental rights, complaints of agency caseworkers misrepresenting the truth to judges in order to accomplish an outcome which the caseworker has predetermined, complaints of parents who fully comply with caseworkers requirements for regaining custody of their children, only to have the paperwork “lost’ or “not read”, cannot be tolerated. Presently, Oregon
Courts refuse to hold the occasional malfeasant child caseworkers liable for the costs, trauma and grief their intentional, dishonest acts cause children and families.
|
|
Missed a Newsletter? Download all past newsletters for the 2005 Session at http://www.leg.state.or.us/richardson/news.htm |
Capitol Office
900 Court Street NE
H-285
Salem OR 97301
Tel: (503) 986-1404
Fax: (503) 986-1590
E-Mail: Richardson.Rep@state.or.us
Please tell a friend about House District 4 Legislative Update.
Click here to subscribe.
To unsubscribe to this newsletter, send an e-mail to nick@dennisrichardson.org with "unsubscribe" in the Subject line.